Skip to main content
Today · Plain-English health journalism — fact-checked, ad-free, and free for everyone. · Every claim cited to the evidence.
Women’s Health

The Menstrual Cycle and Training: Phase-Based Periodization for Female Athletes

What the research says — and doesn’t say — about training across the menstrual cycle. Practical adjustments without the cycle-syncing hype.

Share: 𝕏 f in
Evidence-based guide to training around the menstrual cycle. McNulty 2020 meta-analysis on performance effects, Sims 2018 on heat tolerance, and pract

Educational journalism, not medical advice. Every claim here is checked against its cited sources by editor Tim Bunce — a health writer, not a physician. It isn’t specific to your situation: for health decisions, talk to your own clinician. How we work →

The 60-second version

The "cycle syncing" trend promised a tailored training plan for each of the four menstrual phases. The science behind those specific prescriptions is much thinner than the marketing suggests. A 2020 systematic review (McNulty et al.) covering 78 studies concluded that performance differences across the menstrual cycle are trivial to small and highly inconsistent. While hormonal effects are real, they are gradients, not switches. Modest, evidence-grounded adjustments — like managing heat tolerance in the luteal phase and scheduling PR attempts in the follicular phase — out-perform the rigid four-phase choreography favored by lifestyle influencers.

What the cycle does, briefly

A typical 28-day cycle runs through two main hormonal phases. Lifestyle content often subdivides these into "menstrual," "follicular," "ovulatory," and "luteal," but the two-phase structure clusters the most relevant hormonal changes for athletes.

What the research actually shows

A 2020 systematic review by McNulty and colleagues in Sports Medicine — covering 78 studies and 1,193 participants — concluded that phase-of-cycle effects on strength performance are real but modest, and individual variation within a person dwarfs the average phase effect McNulty 2020.

A separate review by Sims and Heather (2018) highlighted two more reliable findings regarding the luteal phase Sims 2018:

Practical recommendations

Rather than four rigid prescriptions, three phase-aware adjustments capture most of the benefit available.

1. Lift heavy when you feel best — usually follicular

Many lifters report feeling strongest in the days immediately after their period ends. Estrogen is rising, progesterone is low, and recovery feels easy. This is a reasonable window to schedule heavy compound work, PR attempts, or volume-heavy peaks.

The feel is more reliable than the calendar — track how you actually perform across cycles and let your own data inform the plan. Training during menstruation is fine for the majority of athletes; the older taboo around it has no physiological basis.

2. Adjust heat-stressed endurance work

Expect 5 to 10 percent reduced tolerance for heat-stressed sessions in the luteal phase. Practical adjustments:

3. Lean modestly on carbs in the luteal phase

If you experience luteal-phase appetite increases (resting metabolism rises ~7 to 10 percent), eat to it rather than fighting it. Slightly higher carbohydrate intake matches the modest shift in substrate use reported in the literature.

Hormonal contraceptives

Hormonal contraceptives (pills, IUDs, etc.) suppress or alter the natural cycle. A 2020 review by Elliott-Sale et al. concluded that hormonal contraception produces small negative effects on performance on average — about 0.4 to 0.6 percent — but with wide individual variation Elliott-Sale 2020.

If you are on a hormonal contraceptive, don't try to map your training to a "natural" cycle phase that no longer applies. Track your actual performance pack week-by-week as the planning unit.

Volume management and PMS

For training purposes, two adjustments are worth making in the late luteal phase if symptoms are significant:

Summary of findings

The bigger threat to performance isn't your phase — it's your iron

If you are looking for a cycle-related factor that genuinely moves the needle on performance, iron is a far better place to spend your attention than which phase you train in. Menstruating women lose iron with every period — roughly 0.5 to 2 mg per day of bleeding — and that recurring loss, layered on top of the iron athletes shed through sweat, footstrike-related red-cell breakdown, and small gut losses, makes iron deficiency one of the most common nutritional problems in female sport. Across cohorts, the prevalence in exercising women has been estimated at up to about 50% Sim 2019, and a case study of internationally competitive female endurance athletes found 46% (6 of 13) below the athlete-specific ferritin cut-off despite none meeting the strict clinical definition of anaemia Sims 2022.

The mechanism is worth understanding because it changes what you do about it. Exercise — especially prolonged or high-intensity work — triggers a spike in hepcidin, a liver hormone that acts as the body's iron gatekeeper. When hepcidin rises, it shuts down absorption of iron from food and supplements and locks iron away inside cells. An individual-participant meta-analysis confirmed that hepcidin climbs after exercise and tends to peak around three to six hours afterward, blunting absorption during that window Fensham 2023. There is also a cycle wrinkle here: hepcidin appears to be lowest in the early follicular phase (the first days of your period), which means iron you eat or supplement at that time may be absorbed more readily — a small, biologically plausible reason to concentrate iron intake early in the cycle Sim 2019.

Why this matters more than phase timing: a 2024 systematic review of 23 studies and 669 trained female athletes found that iron deficiency — even without anaemia, where haemoglobin is still normal but ferritin (your stored-iron marker) is low — was associated with roughly a 3% to 4% reduction in endurance performance, and that correcting it with iron raised maximal aerobic capacity by about 6% to 15% in deficient athletes Pengelly 2025. Those numbers dwarf the "trivial" phase effects the rest of this article describes McNulty 2020. The practical takeaway: if your training feels flat, your recovery is poor, or you bruise easily on hard endurance work, ask your clinician for a blood test that includes ferritin, not just haemoglobin — standard anaemia screening misses iron-deficiency-without-anaemia entirely. Many sports-medicine practitioners flag ferritin below about 30 µg/L as worth investigating in endurance athletes Sim 2019. Do not start high-dose iron supplements on your own: excess iron is harmful, some people have conditions that cause iron overload, and supplementation should be guided by a blood test and a clinician.

When a missing period is a warning sign, not a training goal

There is a dangerous misreading of "cycle and training" content worth heading off directly: a regular menstrual cycle is a marker of health, and losing it because of hard training and undereating is not a sign of being "lean and fit" — it is a red flag. The relevant framework is Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs), formalised by the International Olympic Committee, which evolved from the older "female athlete triad" of disordered eating, menstrual dysfunction, and low bone density Mountjoy 2023. The root cause is low energy availability: not eating enough to cover both training and basic bodily function. When the body is chronically short of fuel, it downregulates non-essential systems — and reproduction is one of the first to go.

The 2023 IOC consensus describes REDs as a syndrome of impaired functioning that extends well beyond periods, affecting metabolic rate, bone health, immunity, protein synthesis, and cardiovascular and mental health Mountjoy 2023. The bone consequences are the most concrete reason not to dismiss missing periods: athletes with absent (amenorrhoea) or irregular (oligomenorrhoea) cycles or low energy availability show reduced bone mineral density, altered bone microarchitecture, and a measurably higher risk of bone stress injuries — stress fractures — than athletes who are eating enough and cycling normally Mountjoy 2023. In adolescence, the stakes are higher still, because the late teens and early twenties are when peak bone mass is built; bone density lost to underfuelling in those years may not be fully recoverable.

So the phase-based advice in this article assumes a baseline: a regular, naturally occurring cycle (defined in the research literature as roughly 21 to 35 days with evidence of ovulation) Elliott-Sale 2021. If your periods have become irregular, very light, or stopped — and you are not pregnant or using a contraceptive that suppresses bleeding — that is a reason to see a clinician, not to optimise your deadlift schedule around it. The fix for REDs is rarely "train smarter around your cycle"; it is eating more to restore energy availability. This is a medical issue, and self-diagnosis is unreliable, so loop in a sports physician or your family doctor.

Why the science here is shakier than the headlines suggest

Before you build a training block around any cycle phase, it helps to know how weak much of the underlying evidence actually is — not to dismiss the topic, but to set realistic expectations. The largest synthesis to date, the meta-analysis underpinning this article, rated study quality bluntly: of 78 studies, only 8% were judged high quality, while 42% were low and 26% very low quality McNulty 2020. That is why its authors framed any early-follicular performance dip as "trivial" and recommended individualised, rather than blanket, approaches.

The single biggest flaw runs through most of the literature: studies rarely confirm which phase a participant was actually in. The common shortcut is calendar counting — assuming ovulation falls exactly mid-cycle and that "day 21" is always the luteal phase. But ovulation timing varies substantially between women and even between cycles in the same woman, so a calendar-assigned "luteal" test can easily land in the wrong phase, smearing any real effect into noise Elliott-Sale 2021. Methodologists have argued forcefully that phase should be verified, not estimated, and a 2025 audit of performance studies in elite female athletes found that verification practices remain inconsistent across the field Colenso-Semple 2025. The current gold standard combines calendar tracking with urinary luteinising-hormone (ovulation) tests to time ovulation and a mid-luteal blood test showing progesterone above roughly 16 nmol/L to confirm ovulation actually happened Elliott-Sale 2021.

What this means for you is liberating rather than discouraging. Because the group-average effects are small and the research is noisy, your own tracked experience is more useful than any published cycle-syncing template. If you want to personalise training, the verification logic scales down nicely: log your cycle for at least three to four months, note training quality and symptoms by day, and use a cheap ovulation-predictor kit if you want to actually locate your follicular and luteal windows rather than guess. Treat any pattern you find as your data, not a universal law — and remember that sleep, total fuelling, stress, and training load almost certainly affect a given session more than which phase you are in McNulty 2020.

References

McNulty 2020McNulty KL, Elliott-Sale KJ, Dolan E, et al. The Effects of Menstrual Cycle Phase on Exercise Performance in Eumenorrheic Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2020;50(10):1813-1827. View source →
Sims 2018Sims ST, Heather AK. Myths and Methodologies: Reducing scientific design ambiguity in studies involving women. Transl Sports Med. 2018;1(3):102-111. View source →
Elliott-Sale 2020Elliott-Sale KJ, McNulty KL, Ansdell P, et al. The Effects of Oral Contraceptives on Exercise Performance in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2020;50(10):1785-1812. View source →
Janse de Jonge 2003Janse de Jonge XA. Effects of the menstrual cycle on exercise performance. Sports Med. 2003;33(11):833-851. View source →
Sim 2019Sim M, Garvican-Lewis LA, Cox GR, et al. Iron considerations for the athlete: a narrative review. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2019;119(7):1463-1478. doi:10.1007/s00421-019-04157-y. View source →
Sims 2022Sims ST, Mackay K, Leabeater A, Clarke A, Schofield K, Driller M. High prevalence of iron deficiency exhibited in internationally competitive, non-professional female endurance athletes — a case study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(24):16606. doi:10.3390/ijerph192416606. View source →
Fensham 2023Fensham NC, Govus AD, Peeling P, Burke LM, McKay AKA. Factors influencing the hepcidin response to exercise: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Sports Medicine. 2023;53(10):1931-1949. PMID: 37347443. View source →
Pengelly 2025Pengelly M, Pumpa K, Pyne DB, Etxebarria N. Iron deficiency, supplementation, and sports performance in female athletes: a systematic review. Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2025;14:101009. PMID: 39536912. View source →
Mountjoy 2023Mountjoy M, Ackerman KE, Bailey DM, et al. 2023 International Olympic Committee's (IOC) consensus statement on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs). British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2023;57(17):1073-1097. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2023-106994. View source →
Elliott-Sale 2021Elliott-Sale KJ, Minahan CL, de Jonge XAKJ, et al. Methodological considerations for studies in sport and exercise science with women as participants: a working guide for standards of practice for research on women. Sports Medicine. 2021;51(5):843-861. doi:10.1007/s40279-021-01435-8. View source →
Colenso-Semple 2025Colenso-Semple LM, et al. An audit and quality assessment of the methods used to determine menstrual cycle phases in studies assessing athletic performance in elite female athletes. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2025. doi:10.1080/02640414.2025.2583013. View source →

Related reading

The Women’s Health PillarPillar

The Women’s Health Pillar

Linear, Block, or DUP: Any of Them Beats Winging It by About 7%Training

Linear, Block, or DUP: Any of Them Beats Winging It by About 7%

Heart Rate Zone CalculatorTool

Heart Rate Zone Calculator