The 60-second version
Stair climbing has among the highest minute-by-minute energy expenditures of any common cardio modality — roughly 8–11 METs at sustained pace, comparable to running at 8–9 km/h. The published research supports two distinct training strategies: continuous moderate stair climbing for cardiovascular endurance, and vigorous-intensity intermittent stair-climb “snacks” (3–6 flights of stairs at fast pace, 3 times per day). The intermittent protocol has produced VO&sub2;peak improvements equivalent to 3 hours per week of moderate cardio, in 6–15 minutes total per day. Stairs are accessible (every building has them), low-cost (no equipment), and the descent provides eccentric loading not present in flat-ground walking. The catch is that descents are harder on knees than ascents, and incident-fall risk is real for older adults — scale appropriately.
Why stairs are so energetically expensive
Climbing stairs requires raising body mass against gravity at each step — a vertical-displacement workload absent from flat walking. The metabolic cost is roughly 8–11 METs at sustained pace, which puts it in the same class as 8–9 km/h running and substantially above brisk flat walking (3.5–4 METs). For a 75 kg adult, this translates to roughly 10–14 kcal/min during climbing — high enough that even short bouts accumulate meaningful workload Teh 2002.
The classic Boreham trial
Boreham's 2000 stair-climbing trial randomized 22 sedentary young women to a stair-climbing group (n=12) or a non-climbing control group (n=10); the climbing group progressed from one ascent per day to six ascents per day on one specific 199-step staircase, 5 days per week, for 7 weeks. VO&sub2;max increased by ~17% in the stair-climbing group relative to the non-climbing controls, with a comparable rise in HDL cholesterol and a reduced heart rate during a standardized submaximal stair-climbing test (an exercise-economy measure — the trial did not measure resting heart rate) Boreham 2000. The total time commitment averaged 8–15 minutes per day. The result was striking enough that it spawned a decade of follow-up research on short-bout stair training.
Two vigorous stair-climbing protocols, each performed three times daily on three days a week, produced measurable cardiorespiratory gains within six weeks: a 20-second all-out ascent raised VO&sub2;peak by 12%, and a 60-second one-flight ascent-and-descent raised it by 7%. Total active climbing time was under 10 minutes per week.
— Allison et al., Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2017 view source
The exercise-snacks protocol
Allison's 2017 work tested short, vigorous stair-climbing bouts as a lab-based alternative to sprint-interval training: three 20-second all-out ascents, three days per week, raised VO&sub2;peak by 12% after 6 weeks, and a second protocol of three 60-second bouts climbing one flight up and down at the same frequency raised it by 7%. Total active climbing time was under 10 minutes per week in either protocol Allison 2017.
The follow-up work tested whether the protocol holds up outside the lab. Jenkins 2019 had sedentary adults vigorously climb a 3-flight (60-step) stairwell three times a day, three days a week, for six weeks, against a non-training control group. VO&sub2;peak rose 5% and peak power output rose 12% — confirming the vigorous protocol works on a real-world schedule, though the trial didn’t include a slower-pace comparison arm, so it doesn’t establish that near-maximal pace specifically is what drives the adaptation Jenkins 2019.
The descent matters
Stair descents impose substantial eccentric load on quadriceps and patellar tendon — roughly 3–5x bodyweight at each step's deceleration. This is genuinely beneficial for tendon and connective-tissue adaptation in healthy adults, and it's specifically what flat walking lacks. But it carries two caveats:
- Patellofemoral pain syndrome and existing knee osteoarthritis can be aggravated by frequent descents. If knees are a concern, prefer the elevator down and the stairs up.
- Fall risk on descents is non-trivial for older adults. The published epidemiology is clear: stair-related falls are over-represented in adults 65+. Use handrails. Don't carry items that obscure foot placement.
Three reasonable protocols
- Beginner / habit-formation: Take stairs over elevator/escalator wherever feasible, all day, every day. No specific dose; the cumulative effect is modest but real.
- Intermediate / time-efficient: 3 stair-climb “snacks” per day, 3 days per week. Each snack is a vigorous climb of a 3-flight (~60-step) stairwell. Total weekly commitment: under 15 minutes of vigorous activity.
- Advanced / dedicated training: Continuous stair climbing 15–30 minutes per session, 3 sessions per week, at zone 3–4 pace. Substitutes well for treadmill / outdoor running on bad-weather days.
Practical takeaways
- Stairs deliver high energy expenditure per minute and are accessible everywhere. The cardio-effect-per-minute is excellent.
- The exercise-snack protocol works. 3 flights (~60 steps), vigorous effort, 3 times per day, 3 days per week. Under 15 minutes per week, real VO&sub2;peak adaptation.
- Intensity matters more than volume. Slow stair climbing accumulates calories but doesn’t drive cardiovascular adaptation.
- Descents matter and they’re harder on knees than ascents. Plan accordingly.
- For older adults, fall risk is real. Use handrails, don’t carry obscuring items, and don't push pace where balance is concerned.
Frequently asked questions
Is stair climbing better than walking?
Per minute, yes — about 2–3x the energy expenditure. For total daily activity, the better metric is what you'll actually sustain. Walking 60 minutes outperforms stair-climbing 5 minutes for most outcomes; stair-climbing 5 minutes outperforms doing nothing.
How many stairs is enough?
The published exercise-snack protocol is 3 flights at near-maximal pace, 3 times daily. Total: ~9 flights per day. The Boreham trial used 199-step staircases climbed 1–5 times daily. Both produce measurable cardiorespiratory adaptation.
Can I do this if my knees hurt?
Stair ascents are generally well-tolerated for mild knee pain. Descents are the harder side — eccentric load is 3–5x bodyweight per step. If knees are a problem, take the elevator down and stairs up. For diagnosed patellofemoral pain or significant osteoarthritis, talk to a physiotherapist before adopting a regular stair protocol.
Is it safe for older adults?
Yes, with caveats. Stair-related falls are over-represented in 65+ epidemiology. Always use handrails. Don't carry items that block your view of the steps. Build up duration gradually. The cardiovascular benefit is real and worthwhile at any age, but the fall risk needs respect.
How does it compare to a stair-climber machine?
Stair-climber machines reproduce the metabolic load with less descent strain on knees — useful if joint health is the constraint. Real stairs add the descent eccentric load, which is beneficial for connective tissue but harder on existing knee issues.
References
Boreham 2000Boreham CA, Wallace WF, Nevill A. Training effects of accumulated daily stair-climbing exercise in previously sedentary young women. Prev Med. 2000;30(4):277-281. View source →Allison 2017Allison MK, Baglole JH, Martin BJ, MacInnis MJ, Gurd BJ, Gibala MJ. Brief intense stair climbing improves cardiorespiratory fitness. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(2):298-307. View source →Jenkins 2019Jenkins EM, Nairn LN, Skelly LE, Little JP, Gibala MJ. Do stair climbing exercise ‘snacks’ improve cardiorespiratory fitness? Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2019;44(6):681-684. View source →Teh 2002Teh KC, Aziz AR. Heart rate, oxygen uptake, and energy cost of ascending and descending the stairs. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(4):695-699. View source →


