What this guide is
What actually has evidence β and what's just marketing β for the supplements you keep getting sold
Your free guide. This page is yours to keep — bookmark it or print it. Every claim below links to its source.
The supplement aisle is built to make everything look equally proven. It isn't. A handful of supplements have genuinely strong, repeatable evidence. Most of the popular ones have evidence that is thin, mixed, or paid for by the company selling the product. This cheat-sheet sorts the common ones into honest tiers, with a real citation behind each verdict. The point isn't to talk you into or out of anything β it's to let you spend your money where the science actually is.
How to read the tiers: Strong = multiple high-quality trials or a major position stand agree. Moderate = real signal, but smaller or mixed studies, or it only works in a specific situation. Limited = a little evidence, often weak, conflicting, or industry-funded. No good evidence = the marketing is doing the heavy lifting.
The cheat-sheet at a glance
| Supplement | Honest one-line verdict | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Creatine (monohydrate) | The single best-evidenced sports supplement for strength and lean mass. Cheap, well-studied, safe in healthy people. | Strong 1 |
| Caffeine | A genuine performance aid at 3β6 mg per kg bodyweight, best documented for endurance. | Strong 2 |
| Whey / protein powder | Works β but as a convenient way to hit your protein target, not as magic. Food counts the same. | Strong 3 |
| Vitamin D β if deficient | Helps falls/fractures in people who are actually deficient. Little benefit if your levels are already fine. | Moderate (conditional) 4 |
| Magnesium | Modest help for sleep (mainly if intake is low); does not reliably fix night leg cramps. | Limited / mixed 5 6 |
| Omega-3 (fish-oil pills) | For preventing heart disease in most people, fish-oil supplements do little or nothing. | No good evidence (for that claim) 7 |
| BCAAs | Weaker than a complete protein for building muscle. If you get enough protein, redundant. | Limited 8 |
| Collagen (skin "cure-all") | The skin benefit largely vanishes once you remove industry-funded studies. | Limited / biased 9 |
| Fat-burners / thermogenics | Little proven benefit, poorly regulated, and some are spiked with hidden drugs. | No good evidence 10 |
| "Detox" / cleanse / greens | No solid evidence they remove "toxins." Your liver and kidneys already do that. | No good evidence 11 |
The ones worth your money
Creatine β Strong
- The ISSN position stand calls creatine monohydrate "the most effective ergogenic nutritional supplement currently available" for increasing high-intensity exercise capacity and lean body mass during training. 1
- It's also one of the most-studied: the same review found no compelling evidence of harm from long-term use (up to 30 g/day for 5 years) in otherwise healthy people. 1
- Plain monohydrate is the proven (and cheapest) form. Fancier "advanced" forms charge more for no proven advantage.
Caffeine β Strong
- Caffeine "has consistently been shown to improve exercise performance when consumed in doses of 3β6 mg/kg body mass," with aerobic endurance showing the most consistent moderate-to-large benefit. 2
- More is not better β very high doses (around 9 mg/kg) add side-effects without adding benefit. 2
Whey / protein powder β Strong (but it's just protein)
- A meta-analysis of 49 studies found protein supplementation "significantly enhanced changes in muscle strength and size" during resistance training. 3
- The catch: the benefit came from hitting your total protein target, with little extra gain above roughly 1.6 g/kg/day. Powder is a convenience, not a special ingredient β real food protein does the same job. 3
The ones that depend β read the fine print
Vitamin D β Moderate, but only if you're deficient
- In people who already have adequate vitamin D, large trials of 2,000+ IU/day found no meaningful reduction in falls or fractures. 4
- The benefit shows up in people who are genuinely deficient or insufficient. So the honest move is to test, then treat β not to take it blindly. 4
Magnesium β Limited and situational
- Sleep: a 2025 randomized trial in poor sleepers found magnesium beat placebo on insomnia score, but the effect was small, with the biggest improvement in people whose dietary magnesium was already low. 5
- Leg cramps: a randomized JAMA Internal Medicine trial concluded "oral magnesium oxide was not superior to placebo" for older adults' nocturnal leg cramps β and credited much of the perceived benefit to a placebo effect. 6
The popular-but-weak ones (where marketing outruns evidence)
Omega-3 fish-oil pills β No good evidence for heart protection
- A Cochrane review of dozens of trials concluded that taking long-chain omega-3 supplements "does not benefit heart health or reduce our risk of stroke or death from any cause." 7
- That's about the pills. Eating oily fish as food is a different, more reasonable proposition. 7
BCAAs β Limited; usually redundant
- BCAAs alone can't fully switch on muscle building because they lack the other essential amino acids. A complete protein source (food or whey) provides "the full complement of indispensable amino acids," and the BCAA-only response is "less than" that. 8
- If you already eat enough protein, a separate BCAA tub is largely paying twice for less.
Collagen-for-everything β Limited, and the evidence is funding-dependent
- A 2025 meta-analysis of 23 trials in The American Journal of Medicine found the apparent skin benefits disappeared once industry-funded studies were removed: independently funded trials showed no effect on skin hydration, elasticity, or wrinkles. The authors concluded there is "currently no clinical evidence to support the use of collagen supplements to prevent or treat skin aging." 9
- This is the cleanest real-world example of "the studies that look best are the ones the seller paid for."
Fat-burners / thermogenics β No good evidence, real safety flags
- The FDA repeatedly finds weight-loss/fat-burner products spiked with hidden, undeclared drug ingredients β including, in one case, the active ingredient in a prescription drug that can dangerously lower blood pressure. 10
- Little proven benefit, meaningful risk: an easy skip.
"Detox," cleanses, and "greens" β No good evidence
- The NCCIH notes a review found "no compelling research to support the use of 'detox' diets for weight management or eliminating toxins from the body." 11
- Your liver and kidneys handle detoxification. A powder doesn't.
How to read a supplement claim (so you can do this yourself)
- "Clinically proven" β proven. Ask: proven in how many people, for how long, versus a placebo? One tiny study isn't proof.
- Check who paid. If the flattering studies are funded by the maker β as with collagen β treat the result as a hypothesis, not a fact. 9
- Proxy outcome vs. real outcome. "Boosts a biomarker" or "activates a pathway" is not the same as "makes you healthier, stronger, or live longer."
- Look for the conditional. Several supplements only work in a subgroup (vitamin D if deficient, magnesium if intake is low). General claims hide that.
- Supplements are loosely regulated. In the U.S. a label can make claims without proving them first, and products are sometimes contaminated β so "it's on the shelf" guarantees nothing. 10
- Default to food and to the cheap, proven stuff. Creatine monohydrate and protein are inexpensive and well-evidenced; most premium "stacks" are not.
This cheat-sheet is general information, not medical advice. Supplements can interact with medications and conditions β check with your clinician before starting one, especially vitamin D dosing or anything during pregnancy.
References
ISSN-Creatine-2017Kreider RB, et al. International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and medicine. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2017;14:18. Verbatim: "Creatine monohydrate is the most effective ergogenic nutritional supplement currently available to athletes with the intent of increasing high-intensity exercise capacity and lean body mass during training." Also: "There is no compelling scientific evidence that the short- or long-term use of creatine monohydrate (up to 30 g/day for 5 years) has any detrimental effects on otherwise healthy individuals." View source →ISSN-Caffeine-2021Guest NS, et al. International society of sports nutrition position stand: caffeine and exercise performance. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2021;18:1. Verbatim: "Caffeine has consistently been shown to improve exercise performance when consumed in doses of 3β6 mg/kg body mass"; "Aerobic endurance appears to be the form of exercise with the most consistent moderate-to-large benefits from caffeine use..." View source →Morton-BJSM-2018Morton RW, et al. A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength in healthy adults. Br J Sports Med. 2018. PMID 28698222; DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097608. Verbatim: "Dietary protein supplementation significantly enhanced changes in muscle strength and size during prolonged RET in healthy adults," with diminishing returns beyond ~1.6 g/kg/day. View source →NIH-ODS-VitDNIH Office of Dietary Supplements / vitamin D evidence summaries: large trials (~2000β3300 IU/d) in vitamin-D-replete older adults showed no favorable effect on falls or fractures; benefit concentrated in deficient/insufficient people. View source →MgBisglycinate-NSS-2025Magnesium Bisglycinate Supplementation in Healthy Adults Reporting Poor Sleep: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Nat Sci Sleep. 2025 (PMC12412596). Greater reduction in Insomnia Severity Index vs placebo (β3.9 vs β2.3; p=0.049) but small effect (Cohen's d=0.2); larger improvement in those with low baseline dietary magnesium. View source →Maor-JAMAIM-2017Maor NR, et al. Effect of Magnesium Oxide Supplementation on Nocturnal Leg Cramps: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017. DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9261. Verbatim conclusion: "Oral magnesium oxide was not superior to placebo for older adults experiencing NLC." View source →Cochrane-Omega3-2020Abdelhamid AS, et al. Omega-3 fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; CD003177. Cochrane plain-language summary: long-chain omega-3 supplements do not benefit heart health or reduce risk of stroke or death from any cause. View source →Wilkinson-BCAA-NRR-2023Nutrition Research Reviews update on branched-chain amino acids and muscle protein synthesis (DOI 10.1017/S0954422423000197). BCAA-only response is reduced/transient versus a complete protein providing all essential amino acids. View source →Myung-Park-AJM-2025Myung S-K, Park Y. Effects of Collagen Supplements on Skin Aging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Med. 2025;138(9):1264-1277. PMID 40324552. Subgroup analysis: non-industry-funded trials showed no effect on skin hydration, elasticity, or wrinkles; authors concluded no clinical evidence supports collagen for skin aging. View source →FDA-FatBurner-NotificationU.S. FDA, Medication Health Fraud: Public Notification β Xtreme Fat Burner Capsules contain hidden drug ingredients (sildenafil). FDA repeatedly finds weight-loss/fat-burner products tainted with undeclared active drug ingredients. View source →NCCIH-DetoxNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH). "Detoxes" and "Cleanses": What You Need To Know. A 2015 review found no compelling research supporting detox diets for weight management or eliminating toxins. View source →