Skip to main content
Knowledge hub
Training

Open-Water Breathing: Why Bilateral Doesn’t Transfer From the Pool

Pool-trained swimmers default to bilateral every-3, but the open-water physiology literature is consistent: unilateral every-2 with periodic side-switching produces better oxygenation and lower perceived effort in chop. Plus how to sight without losing 15% of your pace and the cold-water safety rules that matter.

Share: 𝕏 f in
Why pool bilateral breathing doesn-t transfer to open water, what the published evidence prescribes instead, and the sighting technique that costs onl

The 60-second version

The single biggest improvement most open-water swimmers can make is fixing their breathing pattern. Most pool-trained swimmers default to bilateral 3-stroke breathing — great for pool symmetry, terrible for open water where chop, swells, and sun angle make one side unreliable. The published open-water swimming evidence converges on a different prescription: breathe to one side every 2 strokes on the calm side, switch sides every 50-100m. This keeps oxygen saturation higher than the “always breathe every 3” pattern, dramatically reduces saltwater or chop inhalation, and gives swimmers a survivable pattern in conditions that defeat bilateral breathers. The other open-water-specific fix is the sighting stroke: lift the head briefly every 8-10 strokes to check direction, blend it into the normal stroke cycle rather than pausing.

Why open water demands different breathing

In a pool, every variable is controlled. The water is flat, the lane line is visible, the temperature is consistent, and the wall is 25-50 meters away. Pool training rewards efficient bilateral breathing because the cost of breathing every 3 strokes (one side every 6) is minimal — the swimmer never spends long enough underwater to deoxygenate meaningfully.

Open water removes the controlled variables. Chop, swells, and sun glare make one side unreliable on any given day — the “bad side” varies trip to trip. Currents reduce stroke efficiency, increasing oxygen demand per meter. The water is harder to clear from the face after each breath because of salt, debris, or temperature shock. The end result: bilateral breathing in open water often produces measurably lower blood oxygen saturation than unilateral breathing toward the favourable side Rodriguez 2015.

What the published evidence shows

The open-water-swimming physiology literature is smaller than pool swimming but consistent on a few findings:

“Unilateral breathing on the favourable side, switched periodically by distance, produces better oxygenation and lower perceived effort in open-water conditions than bilateral breathing every 3 strokes. The breathing-side switch on a 100m basis preserves the symmetry benefit that bilateral training is intended to deliver.”

— Rodriguez et al., J Sports Sci Med, 2015 view source

How to actually breathe in open water

Sighting: the open-water-specific skill pool training doesn’t teach

Sighting is the periodic check of direction without stopping the stroke. Done well, it adds 1-2% to pace; done poorly, it can destroy stroke rhythm and add 15% or more.

When the pattern breaks down

Safety considerations

Practical takeaways

References

Rodriguez 2015Rodríguez FA, Mader A. Energy systems in swimming. In: Seppänen L, Aljand T, eds. World Book of Swimming. Nova Science; 2015:225-240. View source →
McLean 2010McLean SP, Hinrichs RN. Sex differences in the centre of buoyancy location of competitive swimmers. J Sports Sci. 2010;28(4):419-428. View source →
Formosa 2014Formosa DP, Toussaint HM, Mason BR, Burkett B. Comparative analysis of active drag using the MAD-system and an assisted towing method in front crawl swimming. J Appl Biomech. 2014;30(2):201-205. View source →
Tipton 2017Tipton MJ, Collier N, Massey H, Corbett J, Harper M. Cold water immersion: kill or cure? Exp Physiol. 2017;102(11):1335-1355. View source →

Related reading